This film has been in
development for years and years, and has gone down as one
of the most bizarre cases of movie making in a very long
while. For starters, Paul Schrader was the original
director of the film and was during the editing stages of
production when Warner Brothers scrapped his film and
brought in veteran action director Renny Harlin to redo
the project. According to Warner Brothers, Schrader's
version was just not scary enough. Secondly, when Harlin
came in to reshoot, the production experienced troubles
with the location -- another film, oddly enough "The
Passion of the Christ", was shooting at the exact
same locations and were taking up more time than intended.
Eventually, Harlin finished his version and that is what I
viewed in the theatre for close to two hours. Was it worth
the wait and my valuable time? Well...
Stellan Skarsgard stars as Father Lancaster Merrin -- the
same priest, played by Max Von Sydow, who helped drive out
Satan in the original film. Alas, he has lost his faith
and serves only as an archaeologist. Father Merrin has
been hired by a group of individuals to find a rare, and
equally evil, idol that is supposedly hidden in a recently
unearthed church in Africa. The odd thing -- this church
was erected before Christianity came to that part of the
world. So, Father Merrin descends upon Africa, with the
assistance of Father Francis (James D'Arcy), a
representative of the Vatican. What they find is a dig
site that is clashing with the local tribe. The tribe is
terrified of the church and the dig site, for they believe
a great evil dwells there. Slowly, events happen that
change Father Merrin's perspective on evil. The film
essentially deals with Father Merrin trying to uncover the
secrets behind the church and the causes for all of the
odd events occurring around!
I want to see Paul Schrader's version. It has been called
'slower going' and 'not quite scary enough' by Warner
Brothers and those few lucky souls who were allowed to see
a screening. Alas, I feel that Renny Harlin's version
tried too hard to be scary and shocking -- tried too hard
to offer something that would make people of today react
in the way people of 1973 reacted with the original.
Sounds are intentionally louder than they should be. There
are too many scenes of complete dark made illuminated by a
lamp or torch, only to have something waiting in the
shadows. The sound effects are so overcompensating that,
when Father Merrin picks up a shovel, it sounds like a
semi crashing into a brick wall -- it is that loud and
jarring. There is also some unneeded gore involving a baby
being born and some useless flashbacks involving Nazi
Germany.
The performances are, for the most part, dead on. Stellan
Skarsgard seems a little tired in the role, which I will
contribute to his shooting the same film, back to back,
with different directors. I would be tired too. The
remainder of the cast is, basically, unknown -- people you
have never seen before. I am anxious to see if that is the
case in Schrader's version also, or if some of the cast
just didn't agree to come back for a complete reshoot of
the entire film. I know several of the actors Schrader
wanted for the film declined due to the subject matter and
the 'accidents' that occurred during the filming of the
others in the series.
In terms of being frightening, Renny Harlin has delivered.
I heard people screaming and gasping throughout the film,
and I jumped several times myself -- some being from those
'startle' moments, and some being from sheer 'I don't
wanna look at this'. The music and the build-ups are
perfectly timed and Harlin has managed to give us a few
moments that rival some of the scenes from the original,
though this does pale in comparison to the original. I
think, once Schrader's version is released on DVD
alongside this one, the public will get to decide if
coherent storylines take precedent over scares and gore.
"Exorcist: The Beginning" was much better than I
thought it was going to be, and despite the
overcompensating, is very well made and genuinely
frightening.