|
In a nutshell, "Iris" is about the romance and lives
of writers Iris Murdoch and John Bayley. But even more so,
it's about Iris's battle with Alzheimer's disease late in her
life and the care by Bayley to tend to her physical needs.
The film alternates often (and I mean often!) between the
younger Iris and John played magnificently by Kate Winslet and
Hugh Bonneville, and the old Iris and John played by Judi Dench
and Jim Broadbent. Dench, Broadbent, and Winslet were all
nominated for Academy Awards.
Let me start off by saying all the actors give outstanding
performances in this film. The three Academy Awards earned
by the actors were most deserving. Matter of fact,
watching this film is like watching a stage drama when the
acting blows you away. However, there are other
aspects to this film which made it an overall disappointing
movie experience for me. The constant switching between
scenes with the young Murdoch and Baley and scenes when they are
older was too distracting. Sometimes the scenes go back
and forth within seconds of each other which makes it hard to
get a feel for what the characters are going thru for that
particular time. The film would be more compelling
if these scenes were allowed to be drawn out so that the
emotions displayed could be better felt by the audience.
The biggest problem with the film is it's dealing and showing
the relationship between the writers. While the entire
film deals with this man and woman being with each and being in
love with each other, it does not explain well enough how these
two complicated people, who seemingly totally different in
character and persona, would actually fall for each other and
spend the rest of their lives together. They pretty much
get together right off the bat and I would have preferred to see
how their attraction developed. Also, at least two thirds
of the film deals with Iris being in a funk with her Alzheimer's
disease. I wanted to see more of the healthy Iris and all
the things that made her an exciting person and writer. I
believe if more time was spent showing how these two people came
to depend on each other and less time showing Iris roaming about
in a daze not knowing where she was or who people were, the film
would have been much more powerful.
Now, I'm not saying this is a bad film. It's just that I
expected a more compelling film, especially with all the great
acting involved in the movie. I guess if you want to see
the devastating effects that Alzheimer's disease can result in,
especially to a most intelligent and life-loving person as Iris
was, then this movie succeeded. But if you want to see
more insight to these character's persona and love for each
other, and what made them what they were, then the movie failed
to some extent.
-- Mike
( 2 1/2 out of 4 pops )
Talk
about this film with other Popkorn Junkies |
|
Other Junkie's
opinions.....
Billy Ray ( 2 1/2 out
of 4 pops )
I finally got around to seeing this one, after weeks of waiting on it to
finally come to my area. "Iris" was a decent film, but I
did not feel it was good enough to deserve so much critical acclaim.
The performances, which are what received most of the critical acclaim,
are outstanding, though--especially Jim Broadbent, who shows how
versatile an actor he is by going from a singing and dancing burlesque
owner in "Moulin
Rouge"
to such an intense and moving character in "Iris". And,
has Judi Dench ever chosen a bad role? Even if she has, she still
gives one hell of a performance--kind of like "The
Shipping News".
Kate Winslet is also on target in this film, though she certainly did
not deserve the Oscar nomination. This is one that you can
definitely wait until video to see--you gain nothing extra by seeing it
in the theater.
|